The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all.

The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all.

The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all. You hold a church office, a dismissal during the sedis vacancy is not permitted. This argument again rejects the diocesan instructions that denunciation during the episcopal period is very possible.

The proceedings were therefore interrupted

Scheriau said that after the dismissal was followed by a dismissal, she would have to interrupt the dismissal procedure. But she asked both sides to consider a possible comparison. Klein said that if there was an offer, they would talk about it. The diocese’s lawyer, Christian Tschurtschenthaler, narrowed down a possible offer to the range between termination and dismissal, which Klein indignantly rejected. The trial was closed after only ten minutes, and the next thing to do is to argue about his release. For those affected, the expulsion is completely unjustified, Tschurtschenthaler again emphasized that there were good and valid reasons for it.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

The

Case of Bishop Schwarz

, got the news rolling, is drawing wider circles: One

Employee of the Gurk diocese has sued against her dismissal

. The civil proceedings at the Klagenfurt Regional Court were opened on Friday, but were postponed after a short time by Judge Karin Scheriau. The reason: The woman has since been released, which leads to her own trial. Settlement discussions suggested by the judge should have little chance of success.

The employee had claimed that Gerhard Kalidz, the cathedral chapter’s economist, had the

Salzburg Archbishop Franz Lackner

called “old dork”. Burkhard Kronawetter, head of the office for property and law of the diocese, who was present at the conversation in which this statement is said to have been made, denies the statement. The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all. You hold a church office, a dismissal during the sedis vacancy is not permitted. This argument again rejects the diocesan instructions that denunciation during the episcopal period is very possible.

The proceedings were therefore interrupted

Scheriau said that after the dismissal was followed by a dismissal, she would have to interrupt the dismissal procedure.bestessayhelp review But she asked both sides to consider a possible comparison. Klein said that if there was an offer, they would talk about it. The diocese’s lawyer, Christian Tschurtschenthaler, narrowed down a possible offer to the range between termination and dismissal, which Klein indignantly rejected. The trial was closed after only ten minutes, and the next thing to do is to argue about his release. For those affected, the expulsion is completely unjustified, Tschurtschenthaler again emphasized that there were good and valid reasons for it.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

The

Case of Bishop Schwarz

, got the news rolling, is drawing wider circles: One

Employee of the Gurk diocese has sued against her dismissal

. The civil proceedings at the Klagenfurt Regional Court were opened on Friday, but were postponed after a short time by Judge Karin Scheriau. The reason: The woman has since been released, which leads to her own trial. Settlement discussions suggested by the judge should have little chance of success.

The employee had claimed that Gerhard Kalidz, the cathedral chapter’s economist, had the

Salzburg Archbishop Franz Lackner

called “old dork”. Burkhard Kronawetter, head of the office for property and law of the diocese, who was present at the conversation in which this statement is said to have been made, denies the statement. The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all. You hold a church office, a dismissal during the sedis vacancy is not permitted. This argument again rejects the diocesan instructions that denunciation during the episcopal period is very possible.

The proceedings were therefore interrupted

Scheriau said that after the dismissal was followed by a dismissal, she would have to interrupt the dismissal procedure. But she asked both sides to consider a possible comparison. Klein said that if there was an offer, they would talk about it. The diocese’s lawyer, Christian Tschurtschenthaler, narrowed down a possible offer to the range between termination and dismissal, which Klein indignantly rejected. The trial was closed after only ten minutes, and the next thing to do is to argue about his release. For those affected, the expulsion is completely unjustified, Tschurtschenthaler again emphasized that there were good and valid reasons for it.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

The

Case of Bishop Schwarz

, got the news rolling, is drawing wider circles: One

Employee of the Gurk diocese has sued against her dismissal

. The civil proceedings at the Klagenfurt Regional Court were opened on Friday, but were postponed after a short time by Judge Karin Scheriau. The reason: The woman has since been released, which leads to her own trial. Settlement discussions suggested by the judge should have little chance of success.

The employee had claimed that Gerhard Kalidz, the cathedral chapter’s economist, had the

Salzburg Archbishop Franz Lackner

called “old dork”. Burkhard Kronawetter, head of the office for property and law of the diocese, who was present at the conversation in which this statement is said to have been made, denies the statement. The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all. You hold a church office, a dismissal during the sedis vacancy is not permitted. This argument again rejects the diocesan instructions that denunciation during the episcopal period is very possible.

The proceedings were therefore interrupted

Scheriau said that after the dismissal was followed by a dismissal, she would have to interrupt the dismissal procedure. But she asked both sides to consider a possible comparison. Klein said that if there was an offer, they would talk about it. The diocese’s lawyer, Christian Tschurtschenthaler, narrowed down a possible offer to the range between termination and dismissal, which Klein indignantly rejected. The trial was closed after only ten minutes, and the next thing to do is to argue about his release. For those affected, the expulsion is completely unjustified, Tschurtschenthaler again emphasized that there were good and valid reasons for it.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

The

Case of Bishop Schwarz

, got the news rolling, is drawing wider circles: One

Employee of the Gurk diocese has sued against her dismissal

. The civil proceedings at the Klagenfurt Regional Court were opened on Friday, but were postponed after a short time by Judge Karin Scheriau. The reason: The woman has since been released, which leads to her own trial. Settlement discussions suggested by the judge should have little chance of success.

The employee had claimed that Gerhard Kalidz, the cathedral chapter’s economist, had the

Salzburg Archbishop Franz Lackner

called “old dork”. Burkhard Kronawetter, head of the office for property and law of the diocese, who was present at the conversation in which this statement is said to have been made, denies the statement. The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all. You hold a church office, a dismissal during the sedis vacancy is not permitted. This argument again rejects the diocesan instructions that denunciation during the episcopal period is very possible.

The proceedings were therefore interrupted

Scheriau said that after the dismissal was followed by a dismissal, she would have to interrupt the dismissal procedure. But she asked both sides to consider a possible comparison. Klein said that if there was an offer, they would talk about it. The diocese’s lawyer, Christian Tschurtschenthaler, narrowed down a possible offer to the range between termination and dismissal, which Klein indignantly rejected. The trial was closed after only ten minutes, and the next thing to do is to argue about his release. For those affected, the expulsion is completely unjustified, Tschurtschenthaler again emphasized that there were good and valid reasons for it.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

The

Case of Bishop Schwarz

, got the news rolling, is drawing wider circles: One

Employee of the Gurk diocese has sued against her dismissal

. The civil proceedings at the Klagenfurt Regional Court were opened on Friday, but were postponed after a short time by Judge Karin Scheriau. The reason: The woman has since been released, which leads to her own trial. Settlement discussions suggested by the judge should have little chance of success.

The employee had claimed that Gerhard Kalidz, the cathedral chapter’s economist, had the

Salzburg Archbishop Franz Lackner

called “old dork”. Burkhard Kronawetter, head of the office for property and law of the diocese, who was present at the conversation in which this statement is said to have been made, denies the statement. The employee’s lawyer, Kurt Klein, in turn denies that the woman should have been terminated at all. You hold a church office, a dismissal during the sedis vacancy is not permitted. This argument again rejects the diocesan instructions that denunciation during the episcopal period is very possible.

The proceedings were therefore interrupted

Scheriau said that after the dismissal was followed by a dismissal, she would have to interrupt the dismissal procedure. But she asked both sides to consider a possible comparison. Klein said that if there was an offer, they would talk about it. The diocese’s lawyer, Christian Tschurtschenthaler, narrowed down a possible offer to the range between termination and dismissal, which Klein indignantly rejected. The trial was closed after only ten minutes, and the next thing to do is to argue about his release. For those affected, the expulsion is completely unjustified, Tschurtschenthaler again emphasized that there were good and valid reasons for it.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

The

Case of Bishop Schwarz

, got the news rolling, is drawing wider circles: One

Employee of the Gurk diocese has sued against her dismissal

. The civil proceedings at the Klagenfurt Regional Court were opened on Friday, but were postponed after a short time by Judge Karin Scheriau. The reason: The woman has since been released, which leads to her own trial. Settlement discussions suggested by the judge should have little chance of success.

The employee had claimed that Gerhard Kalidz, the cathedral chapter’s economist, had the

Salzburg Archbishop Franz Lackner

called “old dork”. Burkhard Kronawetter, head of the office for property and law of the diocese, who was present at the conversation in which this statement is said to have been made, denies the statement.